Goal
Ensure UI components and meaningful graphics are visually distinguishable from their backgrounds.
Loading ...
Success Criterion · WCAG 1.4.11
The visual presentation of user interface components and graphical objects has a contrast ratio of at least 3:1 against adjacent color(s).
Goal
Ensure UI components and meaningful graphics are visually distinguishable from their backgrounds.
What to do
Meet at least 3:1 contrast for component boundaries, focus indicators, and graphical objects needed to understand content.
Why it matters
Users must be able to perceive controls and graphics; low contrast boundaries make interfaces hard to operate.
Success criterion
Summarized directly from the official Understanding document so teams can quote the requirement accurately.
The visual presentation of the following have a contrast ratio of at least 3:1 against adjacent color(s): User Interface Components (visual information required to identify components and states, except inactive components); and Graphical Objects (parts of graphics required to understand the content, except when a particular presentation is essential).
Intent
Benefits
Why it matters
Summaries drawn from the Understanding document help you socialize impact statements with product stakeholders.
Inputs may “disappear” if borders are too low-contrast against the background.
Focus indicators may be invisible, preventing keyboard users from tracking location.
Meaningful icons (warning, status) may be missed if their strokes are too faint.
Exception guidelines
Document the rationale for each exception and note which alternative support you provide.
Disabled/inactive controls are exempt.
Requirement
Inactive controls do not need to meet 3:1 for their identifying visuals.
Purely decorative graphics are exempt.
Requirement
If not required for understanding, it may be exempt.
If a particular presentation is essential to the information, it is exempt.
Requirement
Only when the specific appearance is essential.
Not only text needs contrast. Interactive controls (like input borders, button outlines, focus indicators, toggles) and meaningful graphical objects (icons, chart lines needed to understand) must also be distinguishable from adjacent colors with at least 3:1 contrast—except for inactive controls and purely decorative visuals.
Reference: All summaries and highlights originate from Understanding WCAG 1.4.11 and the W3C quick reference.
Examples
Share pass/fail snapshots to coach designers, engineers, QA, and content authors.
Pass
Input border contrasts ≥ 3:1 against page background.
Fail
Input border is a faint gray that blends into the background.
Pass
Focus ring is clearly visible in both light and dark themes.
Fail
Focus outline uses a low-contrast color and cannot be seen.
Pass
Warning icon stroke has ≥ 3:1 contrast against background.
Fail
Status icon uses a pale color and is indistinguishable.
Evidence to keep
Capture artifacts for VPATs, procurement reviews, and regression testing.
Official resources
Keep these links handy when writing acceptance criteria or responding to audits.
Official W3C interpretation, techniques, and intent for Non-text Contrast.
Filterable list of sufficient techniques and failures.
Using an author-supplied visible focus indicator.
Failure due to insufficient contrast for graphical objects and UI components.
Implementation checklist
Testing ideas
Related success criteria