Goal
Help users understand abbreviations.
Loading ...
Success Criterion · WCAG 3.1.4
A mechanism for identifying the expanded form or meaning of abbreviations is available.
Goal
Help users understand abbreviations.
What to do
Provide expansions or a mechanism to find expansions for abbreviations (especially those that are ambiguous).
Why it matters
Abbreviations can confuse users, including people with cognitive disabilities and non-native speakers.
Success criterion
Summarized directly from the official Understanding document so teams can quote the requirement accurately.
A mechanism for identifying the expanded form or meaning of abbreviations is available.
Intent
Benefits
Why it matters
Summaries drawn from the Understanding document help you socialize impact statements with product stakeholders.
Users may misinterpret or fail to understand content dense with abbreviations.
Important instructions may be unclear if key abbreviations aren’t expanded.
Provide the expanded form of abbreviations (e.g., “WCAG” → “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines”) via `<abbr>`, inline expansions, or a glossary.
Reference: All summaries and highlights originate from Understanding WCAG 3.1.4 and the W3C quick reference.
Examples
Share pass/fail snapshots to coach designers, engineers, QA, and content authors.
Pass
<abbr title="Web Content Accessibility Guidelines">WCAG</abbr> 2.2
Fail
“WCAG” used repeatedly with no expansion anywhere.
Pass
“AI (Artificial Intelligence)” is expanded on first use.
Fail
“AI” used with no expansion, ambiguous to readers.
Evidence to keep
Capture artifacts for VPATs, procurement reviews, and regression testing.
Official resources
Keep these links handy when writing acceptance criteria or responding to audits.
Implementation checklist
Testing ideas
Related success criteria